(DW) País desbanca Costa Rica e conquista vaga no órgão em Genebra, apesar de protestos de nações e organizações de direitos humanos. Acusado de fazer vista grossa para a candidatura venezuelana, Brasil garante reeleição.
Conselho de Direitos Humanos das Nações Unidas tem 47 vagas, distribuídas seguindo critério de divisão regional
A Venezuela conquistou um assento no Conselho de Direitos Humanos das Nações Unidas em votação realizada nesta quinta-feira (17/10) na Assembleia Geral da organização. O Brasil ficou com a outra vaga destinada a países da América Latina e do Caribe.
Com 105 votos a favor de sua candidatura, Caracas ficou à frente da Costa Rica, que entrou na corrida de última hora com o objetivo explícito de evitar que a Venezuela conquistasse uma vaga. O país da América Central obteve o apoio de 96 países-membros, apenas nove a menos que os obtidos pelo governo venezuelano.
O Brasil, por sua vez, foi reeleito com 153 votos para mais um mandato, com início em 2020. O apoio é um dos menores já recebidos pelo país em votações vitoriosas ao conselho: em 2006, na sua primeira eleição, o Brasil obteve 165 votos; em 2008, foi reeleito com 175 votos; em 2012, recebeu apoio de 184 países entre os 193 membros da ONU, uma marca inédita.
Em sua última eleição, em 2016, sob o governo de Michel Temer, o país obteve apenas 137 votos. Naquele mesmo ano, Cuba recebeu 160 apoios e também entrou para o conselho.
A partir de 1º de janeiro, a Venezuela substituirá o governo cubano no órgão em Genebra. Os dois países eleitos neste ano se juntam a Argentina, Bahamas, Chile, México, Peru e Uruguai no grupo da América Latina e Caribe.
Em reação à eleição, o ministro das Relações Exteriores da Venezuela, Jorge Arreaza, disse que o país está “celebrando uma nova vitória da diplomacia de paz bolivariana”. Já o procurador-geral venezuelano, Tarek William Saab, descreveu a votação como “uma importante conquista”, ao mesmo tempo em que anunciava a libertação de 24 opositores detidos.
A candidatura venezuelana alcançou seu objetivo apesar da forte campanha por parte dos Estados Unidos, vários países da América Latina e organizações de direitos humanos, que instaram os Estados-membros a votarem contra o regime de Nicolás Maduro.
A ONG Human Rights Watch (HRW) chegou a acusar o governo do presidente Jair Bolsonaro de fazer vista grossa à candidatura da Venezuela a fim de garantir sua recondução para uma vaga no conselho, contrariando seu discurso oficial de repúdio a Maduro.
Na véspera da votação, o diretor executivo da HRW, Kenneth Roth, especulou que o governo brasileiro não teria “ficado feliz” com a candidatura de última hora da Costa Rica por receio de arriscar perder a sua própria vaga.
“Será que o governo brasileiro está amaciando sua posição com o conselho para que possa manter sua vaga? Espero que ele não tenha feito esse pacto com o diabo”, disse Roth na quarta-feira.
Nos últimos dias, a HRW e mais de 50 instituições não governamentais de direitos humanos haviam pedido para que as Nações Unidas rejeitassem a candidatura da Venezuela ao Conselho de Direitos Humanos, alegando que o país não cumpre os requisitos para ser membro do órgão.
“Um voto na Venezuela é um voto pela tortura, pelo assassinato e pela impunidade, que se tornaram marcas registradas do governo do presidente Nicolás Maduro”, disse Louis Charbonneau, diretor de Nações Unidas na HRW, antes da votação.
O regime de Maduro é acusado de graves abusos contra os direitos humanos e foi alvo de seguidas denúncias pelo Escritório do Alto Comissário das Nações Unidas para os Direitos Humanos.
Dezenas de países em todo o mundo, incluindo Brasil e Estados Unidos, deixaram de reconhecer o governo de Maduro como legítimo e passaram a apoiar o líder oposicionista Juan Guaidó como presidente interino do país.
Nesta quinta-feira, a ONU elegeu 14 novos ocupantes do Conselho de Direitos Humanos, um dos mais importantes da organização e formado por um total de 47 cadeiras.
Em outras disputas concorridas, o Iraque perdeu no grupo da Ásia, que elegeu Japão, Coreia do Sul, Indonésia e Ilhas Marshall. A Moldávia saiu derrotada na corrida pelos dois assentos do Leste Europeu, conquistados por Armênia e Polônia.
Na África, foram eleitos Líbia, Mauritânia, Sudão e Namíbia. Já a Alemanha – eleita para seu quarto mandato no órgão – e Holanda ficaram com as vagas da Europa Ocidental. A eleição dos dois países europeus foi apenas formalidade, já que eram os únicos concorrentes.
Todos os 193 países-membros da ONU têm direito a voto para eleger os membros do conselho. São necessários ao menos 97 votos favoráveis para que um país seja admitido. O pleito é secreto, e normalmente pesam fatores políticos e regionais que se sobrepõem ao histórico de direitos humanos de um país.
O Conselho de Direitos Humanos foi criado em 2006 para substituir a então Comissão de Direitos Humanos, extinta após 60 anos de trabalhos devido à crise de legitimidade, motivada por decisões vistas como parciais, politizadas e desequilibradas. Divididos em grupos regionais, seus 47 países-membros cumprem mandatos de três anos.
(EXP) Na Venezuela, o salário mínimo mensal, publicado na Gazeta Oficial, é de 40.000,00 bolívares soberanos e, segundo o Banco Central da Venezuela, à taxa de câmbio oficial desta terça-feira, um euro tinha o valor de 14.642,86 bolívares, um pouco mais baixo que os 15.121,00 do mercado paralelo
O salário mínimo mensal dos venezuelanos era esta terça-feira equivalente a 2,46 euros, o valor mais baixo de sempre, um ano depois de o Presidente do país anunciar um plano de “recuperação económica” para combater a crise.
Na Venezuela, o salário mínimo mensal, publicado na Gazeta Oficial (equivalente ao Diário da República em Portugal), é de 40.000,00 bolívares soberanos e, segundo o Banco Central da Venezuela, à taxa de câmbio oficial de hoje, um euro tinha o valor de 14.642,86 bolívares, um pouco mais baixo que os 15.121,00 do mercado paralelo.
“Não faço nada com o salário mínimo, um quilograma de fiambre custa dois salários mensais (80.000 bolívares). Diariamente eu pago 4.000,00 bolívares em autocarro, porque há problemas com o Metropolitano. Com apenas isto, sem comprar comida de verdade, fiquei sem salário”, explicou um professor universitário à agência Lusa.
Júlio Dolande, 58 anos, disse receber um pouco mais de salário, devido à quantidade de horas em que dá aulas e alguns trabalhos de ‘freelancer’, mas insiste que “a situação está verdadeiramente muito crítica”.
“Honestamente, digo, agradeço a Deus porque os meus filhos estão no estrangeiro. Não me enviam dinheiro porque trabalham para sobreviver no Panamá e na Argentina, mas pelo menos não tenho de os manter. Não me dão, mas também não me pedem (nada)”, frisou Júlio Dolande.
O realizador Edgar Roca explicou que para sobreviver as pessoas têm de ter trabalhos adicionais.
“As pessoas têm de ter pelo menos dois empregos e ainda assim passam sérias dificuldades”, referiu, adiantando que em fevereiro deixou o trabalho anterior e o que recebeu de indemnização apenas conseguiu “comprar uma pizza para duas pessoas”.
Vários portugueses explicaram à agência Lusa que um quilograma de carne de vaca, de qualidade intermédia, custa mais ou menos o mesmo que um mês de salário.
Por outro lado, um salário mínimo mensal equivale a três quilogramas de farinha de milho ou três quilogramas de arroz e cinco pães.
Os últimos dados divulgados pela Assembleia Nacional da Venezuela (parlamento, onde a oposição tem maioria) dão conta de que o índice nacional de preços ao consumidor registou um aumento nos preços de 1.579,20% no primeiro semestre deste ano e que a inflação interanual foi de 264.872,90%.
(GUA) ‘Various contacts’ made, says embattled president, amid reports he is negotiating a way to stand down
Nicolás Maduro has confirmed top Venezuelan officials have been talking to members of Donald Trump’s White House, after reports his second-in-command had been negotiating his downfall with the United States.
“I confirm that for months there have been contacts between senior officials from Donald Trump’s government and from the Bolivarian government over which I preside – with my express and direct permission,” Venezuela’s authoritarian leader said in a televised address on Tuesday night.
“Various contacts through various channels,” Maduro added.
Maduro’s remarks came after two reports in the US media claimed Diosdado Cabello, one of Venezuela’s most powerful and feared men, had been engaged in “secret communications” with Trump officials.
On Sunday Axios claimed that in recent months Cabello, the 56-year-old head of Venezuela’s pro-Maduro constituent assembly, had been communicating with Trump’s top Latin America adviser, Mauricio Claver-Carone. Some Trump officials reportedly considered that a positive sign suggesting Maduro’s circle was “gradually cracking”.
The Associated Press claimed Cabello had met someone “in close contact with the Trump administration” in Caracas last month and that a second meeting was envisioned. The US reportedly hoped engaging with Cabello would intensify an internal “knife fight” supposedly raging at the pinnacle of Maduro’s administration.
Observers of Venezuelan politics greeted those reports – apparently designed to destablise Maduro’s crisis-stricken administration by stoking paranoia within his inner-circle – with scepticism.
Christopher Sabatini, a senior fellow for Latin America at the Chatham House thinktank, said: “I think what the US is trying to do is some sort of psy ops thing, trying to rattle people within Maduro’s administration.”
But on Tuesday Maduro confirmed contact with the US, which he painted as proof that he had been seeking ways “for president Donald Trump to truly listen to Venezuela and the truth of the 21st century Bolivarian revolution”.
Earlier in the day Trump told reporters: “We’re talking to various representatives of Venezuela. I don’t want to say who, but we are talking at a very high level.”
Geoff Ramsey, a Venezuela expert at the Washington Office on Latin America, described reports there had been talks between Cabello and Trump officials as “a very positive sign”.
“It suggests an understanding at the top level of [Maduro’s] government that this is unsustainable,” he said of Venezuela’s ongoing economic, political and humanitarian meltdown.
“I think what these people are looking for is some kind of guarantee [from the US] that they are not going to end up in a jail cell in Miami,” Ramsey added.
Maduro has been fighting for his political life since January when a young opposition leader, Juan Guaidó, declared himself Venezuela’s rightful president and received the backing of more than 50 governments, including the US and UK.
More than four million Venezuelans have now fled their oil-rich but economically devastated nation, according to the UN’s refugee agency, with at least 1 million people leaving since last November alone.
(Economist) The harsh new measure will allow the United States to move against any company, or person, trading with the authoritarian regime
AFTER THE axis of evil comes the “exclusive club of rogue nations”. That at least is how John Bolton, Donald Trump’s national security advisor, described Venezuela’s place in the world when he spoke on the sidelines of a conference in Lima, the capital of Peru, on August 6th. The meeting, attended by representatives of 59 countries, was called by the Peruvian government to map out a plan for what to do about Venezuela’s dysfunction and the “day after” Nicolás Maduro, its president, falls from power. But it was the United States that stole the limelight.
On August 5th Mr Trump signed an executive order to, in effect, quarantine Venezuela in economic terms. The American order freezes Venezuelan government assets. It is the harshest measure to date, aimed at all assets instead of specific companies, such as the state oil firm company, PDVSA, as in the past. But it also applies secondary measures to any country that does business with Venezuela. It is these sanctions which could be the most serious threat to Mr Maduro’s government.Get our daily newsletter
Upgrade your inbox and get our Daily Dispatch and Editor’s Picks.
According to Mr Bolton, companies around the world need to decide whether they want to receive a “trickle of income” from Venezuela or trade with the United States. The measure would allow the United States to move against any company, country or individual trading with Venezuela. It is similar to the measures in place against Iran and North Korea. The United States has had similar third-party sanctions in place against Cuba since the early 1960s. The majority of the governments in the region have long opposed them.
American authorities have despaired of Chinese and Russian companies operating in Venezuela. They have warned that debt incurred by what they say is an illegitimate Venezuelan government would not be recognised by Mr Maduro’s successors, if and when he falls. In his address to the conference, Mr Bolton said China and Russia should not “double down on a bad bet.” The US government has been careful to state that the measure does not apply to humanitarian aid or telecoms, which would only worsen conditions for ordinary people in Venezuela.
The Venezuelan government called the move “economic terrorism” and pledged to resist efforts to remove Mr Maduro from power in favour of Juan Guaidó, the speaker of the National Assembly who is already considered by numerous countries, led by America, to be Venezuela’s legitimate president.
The Maduro government and Mr Guaidó’s faction have been talking in Barbados, in negotiations brokered by Norway, not least about organising early elections. Mr Maduro began a second term in power in January. The United States and many Latin American governments oppose holding another election while Mr Maduro remains in power, claiming he could rig them—the charge lodged against him last year.
Attendees of the Lima meeting, which included representatives of Mr Guaidó in an initial session, recognise the massive task of reconstruction, starting with the state-owned oil company and productive infrastructure that have crumbled. Venezuela has the world’s largest crude reserves, which made it one of the richest countries in South America. But production has crashed to fewer than a million barrels a day, two-thirds lower than it was at the turn of the century.
The United Nations in June estimated that more than 4m Venezuelans had fled the country. This is not lost on Peru, the host of the meeting, which has received more than 850,000 Venezuelans in the past few years. “The region cannot continue to be affected by the weight of this crisis, which has turned a country rich in resources into a disaster,” Peru’s foreign minister Néstor Popolizio said at the start of the meeting.
CARACAS (Reuters) – More than half of Venezuela’s 23 states lost power on Monday, according to Reuters witnesses and reports on social media, a blackout the government blamed on an “electromagnetic attack.”
It was the first blackout to include the capital, Caracas, since March, when the government blamed the opposition and United States for a series of power outages that left millions of people without running water and telecommunications.
The blackouts exacerbated an economic crisis that has halved the size of the economy.
Venezuelan Information Minister Jorge Rodriguez said the outage on Monday was caused by an “electromagnetic attack,” without providing evidence. He added that authorities were in the process of re-establishing service.
Power returned for about 10 minutes to parts of southeastern Bolivar state, site of the Guri hydroelectric dam – the source of most of Venezuela’s generation – but went out again, according to a Reuters witness. Electricity was still out throughout Caracas.
“It terrifies me to think we are facing a national blackout again,” said Maria Luisa Rivero, a 45-year-old business owner from the city of Valencia, in the central state of Carabobo.
“The first thing I did was run to freeze my food so that it does not go bad like it did like the last time in March. It costs a lot to buy food just to lose it,” she said.Slideshow (25 Images)
The oil-rich country’s hyperinflationary economic crisis has led to widespread shortages in food and medicine, prompting over 4 million Venezuelans to leave the country.
Venezuela’s national power grid has fallen into disrepair after years of inadequate investment and maintenance, according to the opposition and power experts.
“These blackouts are catastrophic,” said 51-year-old janitor Bernardina Guerra, who lives in Caracas. “I live in the eastern part of the city and there the lights go out every day. Each day things are worse.”
The EU “is ready to start work toward applying targeted measures for those members of the security forces involved in torture and other serious violations of human rights” in Venezuela, EU foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini said Tuesday. Spain had pushed for sanctions over allegations that Rafael Acosta, a navy captain and opposition figurehead, had been tortured to death in custody. “She [Mogherini] threatens us with loathsome comments”, Venezuela said.
(NYT) Venezuela’s Special Action Forces carrying out a security operation in Caracas in April.CreditYuri Cortez/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
GENEVA — Venezuelan special forces have carried out thousands of extrajudicial killings in the past 18 months and then manipulated crime scenes to make it look as if the victims had been resisting arrest, the United Nations said on Thursday in a report detailing wide-ranging government abuses targeting political opponents.
Special Action Forces described by witnesses as “death squads” killed 5,287 people in 2018 and another 1,569 by mid-May of this year, in what are officially termed by the Venezuelan government “Operations for the Liberation of the People,” United Nations investigators reported.
Laying out a detailed description of a lawless system of oppression, the report says the actual number of deaths could be much higher. It cites accounts by independent groups who report more than 9,000 killings for “resistance to authority” over the same period.
“There are reasonable grounds to believe that many of these killings constitute extrajudicial executions committed by the security forces,” the investigators said.
The report, which the United Nation human rights chief Michelle Bachelet will present to the Human Rights Council in Geneva on Friday, delivers a scathing critique of President Nicolás Maduro’s embattled government and its handling of Venezuela’s deepening political and economic crisis.
Since 2016, the report says, the government has pursued a strategy “aimed at neutralizing, repressing and criminalizing political opponents and people critical of the government.”
Venezuela’s Foreign Ministry rejected the findings on Thursday, saying the report offered a “distorted vision” that ignored most of the information presented by the government to United Nations researchers.The officers frisked a group of men during one operation in Caracas.CreditYuri Cortez/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
“The analysis is not objective, nor impartial,” the Foreign Ministry said in a statement, listing what it said were numerous errors. “The negative points are privileged in the extreme and the advances or measures adapted in the area of human rights are ignored or minimized.”
The Special Action Forces, known locally by their Spanish acronym FAES, are nominally tasked with combating drug trafficking and crime, but United Nations human rights officials said they were concerned the government was using these and other security forces “as an instrument to instill fear in the population and to maintain social control.”
Families of 20 young men who were killed in the last year described a pattern of violence in which the FAES units arrived in pickup trucks without license plates, dressed in black and with their faces covered by balaclavas.
They broke into houses, seized belongings and molested women, forcing some to strip naked. Then “they would separate young men from other family members before shooting them,” the investigators reported.
In every case described to the investigators, attackers manipulated the crime scene. “They would plant arms and drugs and fire their weapons against the walls or in the air to suggest a confrontation and to show the victim had resisted authority,” the report says.
The investigators said they had also documented the execution of six young men carried out during one of the house raids, the killings done as a reprisal for their participation in anti-government demonstrations.
Five special forces members were convicted of attempted murder and other offenses in 2018, and another 388 members were under investigation for abuses, according to the report. But few victims, it says, have access to justice or any redress.
The report also describes routine abuse by security and intelligence services of people detained for political reasons. In most of the cases, men and women were subjected to one or more forms of torture, including electric shock, suffocation with plastic bags, water boarding, beating and sexual violence. Women were dragged by their hair and threatened with rape, the report says.
The detentions often had no legal basis, according to the report, which says that more than 2,000 people were arrested for political reasons in the first five months of the year and more than 720 were still detained at the end of May.A member of the Special Action Forces taking part in a security operation.CreditYuri Cortez/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
Human rights activists welcomed the spotlight the report is turning onto government repression and abuses. “The government’s reaction shows it hits the right points,” said Tamara Taraciuk Broner, a senior researcher for Human Rights Watch.
But Ms. Taraciuk expressed disappointment that the report stops short of urging the United Nations to set up a commission of inquiry. It calls instead for the government to set up an independent investigation, with some unspecified international participation.
“You cannot ask Venezuelan courts, which have no independence, to investigate the executive,” she said.
The report comes two weeks after Ms. Bachelet visited Venezuela. Its hard-hitting tone was especially eye-opening, given her political background. In her second term as Chile’s left-leaning president from 2014 to 2018, she was among the few South American leaders who refused to openly criticize Mr. Maduro’s growing authoritarianism.
The Venezuelan government had tried to use Ms. Bachelet’s visit to bolster Mr. Maduro’s international legitimacy. More than 50 nations, including the United States, have stopped recognizing himas Venezuela’s legitimate leader, calling his re-election last year fraudulent.
Ms. Bachelet’s team was given unusual access inside Venezuela, unlike that given to her predecessor or to other United Nations agencies. Mr. Maduro heavily publicized his meeting with Ms. Bachelet and promised to consider allowing her to open a full-time office in the country. The government also agreed to allow two United Nations human rights staff members to work in the country and said it would give them full access to detention centers.
But any hopes that her visit paved the way for a government change of course on human rights were quickly dampened by the news days later of the death in custody of a Navy captain, Rafael Acosta, who was detained the day Ms. Bachelet’s visit ended. His lawyer said he had been in good health at the time of his arrest, but he died in a military hospital a week later showing visible signs beatings.
Ms. Bachelet expressed her shock at Captain Acosta’s death and called for an investigation, but human rights groups said it showed the limited outcome from her visit.
“This case shows that the government of Venezuela is not taking her seriously,” Ms. Taraciuk said.
(WP) Exclusive interview: Maduro’s ex-spy chief reveals allegations against government
Gen. Manuel Ricardo Cristopher Figuera, the ex-spy chief of Venezuela’s President Nicolas Maduro, sat down for an exclusive interview with The Washington Post. (Photo: Josh Ritchie/The Washington Post)By Anthony FaiolaJune 24 at 8:42 PM
BOGOTA, Colombia — In a palace said to befilled with plotters, turncoats and thieves, Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro could count on the loyalty of at least one man: Gen. Manuel Ricardo Cristopher Figuera.
The muscular 55-year-old was one of the revolution’s true believers, having spent a decade as security chief for the late Hugo Chávez, the father of Venezuela’s socialist state and Maduro’s mentor. He studied the art of intelligence with the masters in communist Cuba. He reached the zenith of his power in October with his appointment as head of Maduro’s intelligence police — the feared SEBIN.
And yet, when the U.S.-backed opposition leader Juan Guaidó announced his uprising April 30 to oust Maduro, Figuera emerged as a surprise conspirator — and, as the uprising failed, a man suddenly sprinting for his life into the hands of U.S. operatives in neighboring Colombia.
After nearly two months in hiding here in the Colombian capital, protected around the clock by a security detail, Figuera arrived in the United States on Monday armed with allegations about Maduro’s government:The illicit gold deals. The Hezbollah cells working in Venezuela. The extent of Cuban influence inside Maduro’s Miraflores Palace.
The uprising failed, and Maduro remains in power. But Figuera doesn’t regret turning against his boss.
“I’m proud of what I did,” he said last week from a hotel room in central Bogota. “For now, the regime has gotten ahead of us. But that can quickly change.”
This is the story of how the opposition turned a man once thought to be unturnable — and the information he is now sharing with U.S. officials. It’s based on weeks of interviews with more than a dozen plot participants, opposition leaders and U.S. officials, including 12 hours of exclusive interviews with Figuera, his first with a major news organization, and by far his most exhaustive.
The opposition and the Americans have celebrated a measure of victory with the defection of Figuera — evidence, they say, that they have been effective and their effort remains viable even after the collapse of the uprising.
But as head of the SEBIN, Figuera ran an agency accused of arbitrary detentions and torture. He was one of five senior Venezuelan officials placed under sanctions by the Trump administration in February. His wooing indicates the moral trade-offs Maduro’s opponents have been willing to make in the effort to remove him.
Figuera defends his work advancing Chavismo. But he says he regrets some of its excesses.
“I have a big debt with the people who are still in jail,” hesaid, fighting back tears. “The people who had family members die and couldn’t even see them. This breaks me.”
He continued: “There are many people there who are innocent, and I owe them. I didn’t do enough.
“I thought I would be able to make Maduro see sense. I couldn’t.”
On the balmy Caracas evening of March 28, the plotters against Maduro staged one of their riskiest gambits. Cesar Omaña, a 39-year-old Venezuelan physician, businessman and adventurer, nervously entered the towering headquarters of the SEBIN on a mission to recruit its chief.
Omaña, based in Miami, was living between two worlds. He was close friends with one of Chavez’s daughters and senior Maduro officials, as well as members of the anti-government opposition. Unlike other Venezuelan businessmen involved in the plot, he has not been charged with crimes and had no U.S. sanctions against him. But he was distraught by his country’s collapse under Maduro.
By November, Omaña was in frequent contact with U.S. officials, according to Omaña and the officials. He also established regular contact, even a budding friendship, with the opposition leader Leopoldo López — then Venezuela’s most famous political prisoner, and Guaidó’s mentor.
Juan Guaidó, president of Venezuela’s opposition-led National Assembly, left, and opposition leader Leopoldo López greet supporters during the April 30 uprising. (Cristian Hernandez/AFP/Getty Images)
Omaña was nervous about meeting Figuera.
“He was the third-most powerful man in the country,” he said, sitting next to Figuera in Bogota last week in a black Top Gun ball cap and Yohji Yamamoto sneakers. “He could have just arrested me.”
Figuera was on the Americans’ radar screen. The sanctions froze any U.S.-based assets — he says he didn’t have any — and prohibited Americans from doing business with him. U.S. officials have said publicly that Maduro loyalists who turn against him may have their sanctions lifted.
Omaña and Figuera commenced a kind of cat-and-mouse game, each trying to draw out the other.
“I told him, ‘Tell me something I don’t know,’ ” Figuera said.
Omaña launched into the opposition plan, then still being worked out.
“We talked about South Africa and Mandela,” Omaña said. “And we eventually spoke about an initial plan, a reconciliation law. Convincing Maduro to leave.”
“I told him I was ready to see Maduro leave,” Figuera said.
“And I said, ‘Yes, you’re watching the game, but not playing in it,’ ” Omaña said. “And that kind of broke the ice . . .
In fact, another group of conspirators had already sprung into action.
In February, a group of Venezuelan businessmen, including media mogul Raúl Gorrín, who was put under sanctions by Washington and indicted on U.S. charges of money laundering, approached the Americans with a plan. The centerpiece, according to several people familiar with it: flipping key Maduro loyalists, including the chief justice of Venezuela’s supreme court, Maikel Moreno.
The men had been serving as interlocutors between the Trump administration and members of the regime, the people familiar with the plan said, and were eager to improve their own situations with the United States, where they were used to sending their children to school and their wives on weekend shopping sprees.
According to one senior administration official, the businessmen were told that if they were successful, travel bans and asset freezes could be reversed. The administration would not intervene with the Justice Department to lift indictments — but might put in a good word for those who were helpful.
Maikel Moreno, left, chief justice of Venezuela’s supreme court, at a ceremony in January to open the judicial year with President Nicolás Maduro. (Federico Parra/AFP/Getty Images)
“All we can do is to make the case to DOJ,” said the official, who, like others, spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive policy issues.
Gorrín did not respond to a request for comment.
The businessmen were working to entice the chief justice to turn against Maduro. Their plan, according to several people familiar with it: Moreno would issue a ruling that would restore the authority of the opposition-controlled National Assembly. The assembly had already recognized Guaidó as interim president. Maduro would be forced aside.
Officials in Washington were kept informed of the plot’s progress, according to several people familiar with the situation, and offered regular advice on steps forward. But the plot itself, Venezuelan participants and U.S. officials say, was homegrown in Venezuela.
Moreno would be allowed to stay on as chief justice in a transitional government. But people involved in the talks say Moreno also demanded tens of millions of dollars, to secure votes on the court and provide a safety net for himself. Figuera said he intercepted conversations on WhatsApp indicating that the total pool of cash demanded by Moreno had topped $100 million.
One of the businessmen involved in the alleged offer said U.S. officials were told about it. He said the Americans didn’t endorse the idea, but they didn’t object.
Two senior U.S. officials denied knowing about the offer before April 30. It was only after the uprising crumbled, one said, that Washington learned of Moreno’s demand for cash.
After his meeting with Omaña, Figuera said, he felt a spark of hope. He had worked for years in military intelligence. But his new job as head of the SEBIN, he said, had opened his eyes to the extent of the rot in Maduro’s government.
“I never saw the country’s situation and the government’s corruption as closely as I did during my last six months,” he said. “I quickly realized that Maduro is the head of a criminal enterprise, with his own family involved.”
Figuera had begun to investigate allegations about a company set up by an assistant to Maduro’s 29-year-old son, Nicolás Maduro Guerra. He said the company had established a monopoly on buying gold from small miners in the country’s south at discounted prices and selling it at elevated prices to Venezuela’s central bank.
He was preparing to go to Maduro with the information, he said, but was warned off by a key Maduro aide.
Members of the SEBIN, the Venezuelan intelligence agency, stand guard outside the house of former police commissioner Iván Simonovis in Caracas. (AFP/Getty Images)
Figuera said he uncovered what he described as money laundering involving then-Vice President Tareck El Aissami, now Maduro’s minister of industries, who has been placed under sanctions and indicted in the United States on drug-trafficking charges.
El Aissami has publicly denied any wrongdoing. Neither he nor the other officials named by Figuera for this article responded to requests for comment submitted to Venezuela’s Ministry of Communications. The Washington Post could not independently confirm Figuera’s allegations.
Figuera said he saw intelligence indicating that illegal groups were operating in Venezuela with the protection of the government. They included members of the Colombian guerrilla group ELN, active around mining areas in southern Bolivar state and promising to provide a first line of defense should foreigners invade Venezuela.
He said he saw intelligence that Hezbollah had operations in Maracay, Nueva Esparta and Caracas, apparently geared toward illicit business activity to help fund operations in the Middle East.
“I found that the cases of narco-trafficking and guerrillas were not to be touched,” Figuera said.
Yet the inner workings of a dysfunctional government divided among the personal fiefdoms of warring officials caused him the most despair.
He recalled a meeting with Iris Varela, Maduro’s fiery minister of prisons, and Vladimir Padrino López, Maduro’s defense minister. He said Varela was demanding 30,000 rifles to start her own private army.
“She said that she had trained male prisoners,” Figuera said. “That she was their commander.”
Maduro, meanwhile, relied on 15 to 20 Cubans for personal security. Some were military guards, Figuera said. But three Cubans, called “the psychologists,” served as special advisers who would analyze Maduro’s speeches to assess their public impact.
Figuera saw Maduro multiple times a week at cabinet meetings. When he sought a one-on-one meeting this year, hewas told to go through “Aldo” — a Cuban.
“I was like, ‘What?’ I’m his intelligence chief, and I have to go through a Cuban to be able to meet with him?”
Power outages nationwide paralyzed Venezuela in March. Figuera and other senior officials were in a meeting with Maduro when Raúl Castro called, Figuera said. Maduro took the phone into a corner of the room to speak to the former Cuban president.
Maduro, left, meets with Raúl Castro, Cuba’s former president, in Havana last December. (Yamil Lage/AFP/Getty Images)
When the call ended, Figuera said, Maduro appeared relieved. Castro had promised to dispatch a team of Cuban technicians to help solve the problem.
“Raúl Castro was like an adviser for Maduro,” Figuera said. “If he was in any meeting, it would be interrupted if Castro was on the phone.”
In April, Figuera said, he delivered a message to Maduroin a locked suitcase. Only he and Maduro had the code. He described the country’s situation as deplorable and suggested new elections.
Maduro texted him the next day.
“He called me a coward, a defeatist,” Figuera said. “That’s when I knew I had to act.”
In the days following Omaña’s visit, Figuera said, he began meeting with Omaña’s top ally in the opposition. Leopoldo López had been shuttled between house arrest and a prison cell since 2014. Gaining access was no problem — Figuera, as head of the SEBIN, was his jailer.
During these meetings, Figuera said, he learned of the uprising planned for May 1. Moreno would issue the ruling reinstating the National Assembly. Padrino, the defense minister, would back the ruling and force Maduro out.
According to Figuera, the plotters were all given code names. Figuera, an Afro-Venezuelan, was the Black Panther. Omaña was Superman. Mauricio Claver-Carone, the U.S. National Security Council’s director for Latin American policy, was Comeniños — the Child Eater.
But as May 1 approached, Figuera said, he grew uneasy. During an April 23 meeting at Moreno’s Caracas mansion, he thought the chief justice seemed hesitant. Moreno suggested that he, rather than Guaidó, become president, according to several people who were present.
On April 27, Figuera met with Moreno and Padrino at Padrino’s home.
“It was a short conversation,” Figuera said. “They kept looking at each other nervously.”
Figuera called Padrino the next day to reassure himself that the defense chief was still on board. But Padrino was watching “Avengers: Endgame,” Figuera said, and “didn’t want to talk.”
Neither Moreno nor Padrino responded to requests for comment.
Venezuelan Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino López delivers a speech in Caracas in February. Behind him are portraits of Simón Bolívar and Hugo Chávez. (Yuri Cortez/AFP/Getty Images)
Opposition officials have said they moved up the date of the operation by one day because they heard that Guaidó might be arrested. Figuera said he was the one who accelerated the timetable.
On April 29, Figuera said, he learned that Maduro’s feared colectivos were preparing a large-scale assault on a May Day protest that could result in a “bloodbath.”
He told Padrino of the new timetable himself.
“Are you crazy?” Padrino responded, in Figuera’s telling. “What about the ruling? How are you going to do it?”
“It’s happening,” Figuera said he responded. “If not, May 1 will be bloody. . . . We have to move fast.”
Figuera and other plotters said they received confirmation that Moreno was prepared to issue his ruling on April 30. But after hearing Padrino’s skepticism, Figuera said, he began calling other military figures.
The plan, he insisted, had to move forward. But as it did, in the early hours of April 30, it began to fall apart.
Guaidó signed a pardon freeing López from house arrest. Guaidó and López made their triumphant predawn appearance at the La Carlota military base in Caracas and called for the military and the people to rise up.
Figuera drove around Caracas to see who was joining the effort.
His phone rang. It was his boss.
“Maduro was very nervous,” Figuera said. “He kept asking me, ‘What’s happening?’ ”
Maduro kept calling. Finally, around 6:30 a.m., Maduro told Figuera to report to the infamous Helicoide Prison.
“I called my wife and told her, ‘I’m going to have to turn myself in.’ ”
Barbara Reinefeld, Figuera’s wife, was with family in Miami when her smartphone rang. Her husband ran through the failed plot and Maduro’s final order.
She insisted that he not turn himself in, that he make a run for the border.
Two months earlier, during a trip to San Juan, Puerto Rico, Reinefeld had been contacted by two people who identified themselves as FBI agents. They interviewed her, she said, and established a system to communicate with her covertly.
Figuera said that he blessed this back channel but that he had no communication with the Americans himself.
Gen. Manuel Ricardo Cristopher Figuera, photographed in an undisclosed location after arriving in the United States on Monday. (Josh Ritchie/For The Washington Post)
Soon after her husband’s April 30 call, Reinefeld was contacted by Venezuelans in Miami, one of them a relative of Guaidó. A senior Trump administration official was aware of her plight, they said, and offered to meet her in Washington.
She flew to Washington on May 1 and received assurances that her husband would be safe if he got to Colombia. Figuera, tapping military contacts on the ground, fled the country, arriving in the border city of Cúcuta on May 2, where he was greeted by Colombian intelligence officers .
The next day he was in Bogota, meeting with U.S. officials.
Moreno, Padrino and other Maduro loyalists have said publicly that they had no part in the plot. Two days after the uprising failed, Padrino appeared with Maduro and suggested that he had refused the opposition’s overtures.
“Don’t come and buy us with a false offer . . . as if we didn’t have dignity,” he said.
Within a week of Figuera’s arrival in Colombia, the Trump administration lifted the sanctions against him.
Figuera says he has had a rocky time in his initial debriefings with U.S. officials. He has recognized Guaidó as Venezuela’s rightful leader but remains, at heart, a Chavista. He and others believed his life was threatened by Colombian guerrillas aligned with the Venezuelan government. Omaña arrived in Bogota last week to help negotiate Figuera’s safe passage to the United States.
Figuera is a product of the socialist government he served for years. He says he regrets some, but not all, of his actions on its behalf.
“If I told you I was Mother Teresa, you would not take me seriously,” he said.
Somewhere Hugo Chavez, who several years ago successfully repatriated much of Venezuela’s gold, is spinning in his grave.
It started in March, when Venezuela’s embattled leader Nicolas Maduro defaulted on a $1.1 billion gold-backed loan with Citi, in the process losing several tons of gold placed as collateral by Venezuela’s central bank after the deadline for repurchasing them expired. Now, Bloomberg reports that Venezuela has also defaulted on a gold swap agreement valued at $750 million with Deutsche Bank, prompting the German bank to seize the precious metal which was used as collateral, and close out the contract.Maduro and a stack of 12 Kilogram gold ingots.
As part of a financing agreement signed in 2016 which we profiled here, Venezuela received a cash loan from Deutsche Bank and put up 20 tons of gold as collateral. The agreement, which was set to expire in 2021, was settled early due to missed interest payments as Venezuela has now effectively run out of foreign reserves.
It was the second time this year that the Maduro’s regime has failed to make good on financing agreements which have resulted in losses at a time when gold reserves are already at a record low. As we have noted previously, for example in “Venezuela Prepares To Liquidate Its Remaining Gold Holdings To Pay Coming Debt Maturities” Venezuela’s dwindling gold holdings had become one of Maduro’s last remaining sources of cash keeping his regime afloat and his military forces loyal. Before the central bank missed the abovementioned March deadline to buy back gold from Citigroup for nearly $1.1 billion, the Bank of England refused to give back $1.2 billion worth of Venezuelan gold.
Meanwhile, as Bloomberg reports, opposition leader Juan Guaido’s parallel government has asked the bank to deposit $120 million into an account outside President Nicolas Maduro’s reach, which is the difference in price from when the gold was acquired to current levels.
“We’re in touch with Deutsche Bank to negotiate the terms under which the difference owed to the central bank will be paid to the legitimate government of Venezuela,” said Jose Ignacio Hernandez, Guaido’s U.S.-based attorney general. “Deutsche Bank can’t risk negotiating with the central bank’s illegitimate authorities,” particularly after it was sanctioned by the U.S. government, Hernandez said, even though the military has stubbornly refused to go along with the US attempted government coup, leaving the seized gold in limbo.
While insolvent Venezuela, which defaulted on its dollar-denominated bonds in 2017, is becoming increasingly cut off from the global financial network due to sanctions, it still managed to sell $570 million in gold last month, prompting total foreign reserves to tumble to a 29-year low of $7.9 billion.
Meanwhile, Venezuela has not only become a symbol of the destructive influence of socialism and associated hyperinflation, but a case study of how to obliterate the only real hard currency left when everything else is gone: the government managed to blow through more than 40% of Venezuela’s gold reserves last year, selling to firms in the United Arab Emirates and Turkey in a desperate bid to fund government programs and pay creditors.
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – President Donald Trump said on Monday that Russia told the United States it had removed “most of their people” from Venezuela, where Moscow has maintained military and economic ties with socialist President Nicolas Maduro.U.S. President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump are seen at Westminster Abbey as part of their state visit in London, Britain June 3, 2019. REUTERS/Carlos Barria
Trump posted a message on Twitter about the alleged Russian drawdown while on a state visit to London but did not provide any further details.
The Trump administration, which backs opposition leader Juan Guaido as the country’s legitimate interim president, has insisted that Russian and Cuban support for Maduro has been essential to keeping him in power and has called for them to withdraw security personnel.
Moscow sent nearly a hundred Russian special forces and cybersecurity personnel to Caracas in March, U.S. officials have said. Private military contractors who do secret missions for Russia flew into Venezuela in late January to beef up security for Maduro, according to people close to them.
“Russia has informed us that they have removed most of their people from Venezuela,” Trump tweeted.
It was unclear exactly who Trump was referring to or how this was communicated to him, and the White House did not provide any clarity. There was also no immediate word from Moscow.
However, if true, it could mark a significant setback for Maduro.
Trump’s tweet followed a Wall Street Journal article on Sunday that said Russia’s state defense contractor Rostec had cuts its staff in Venezuela to just a few dozen, citing a person close to the Russian defense ministry.
Most other Western countries also support Guaido, who invoked the constitution in January to assume the interim presidency, arguing that Maduro’s 2018 re-election was illegitimate.
Maduro has the backing of Russia, China and Cuba and continues to control most state institutions, including the military.
Trump, who had previously called for Russia to “get out” of Venezuela, said following a phone call with President Vladimir Putin last month that the Russian leader was “not looking at all to get involved in Venezuela.”
Trump’s comments appeared to contradict his aides’ harsher assessments of Russia’s role in the crisis-stricken South American country.
Venezuela’s economy is in shambles and the country has plunged into political chaos. The dysfunction is so great that basic economic data has been hard to come…Wednesday, May 29th 2019, 4:14 PM EDTBy Jorge Luis Prez Valery and Abdel Alvarado, CNN Espanol
Venezuela’s economy is in shambles and the country has plunged into political chaos. The dysfunction is so great that basic economic data has been hard to come by.
On Tuesday, for the first time in three years, the Central Bank of Venezuela published statistics on the country’s battered economy. The bank’s records show that in the third quarter of 2018, gross domestic product contracted a shocking 22.5% over the prior year.
Bank records showed that the country’s GDP has been in decline since the start of 2014 — contracting 52% between the third quarter of 2013 and the third quarter of 2018. That means the size of Venezuela’s economy was reduced by half in a span of five years.Follow this story to get email or text alerts from NBC2 when there is a future article following this storyline.Follow this story
Price inflation is out of control in Venezuela. The inflation rate hit 130,060% in 2018, according to the new data.
Runaway inflation has decimated Venezuela. As the value of money and wages has become worth less and less, the despair on the population has deepened.
The inflation rate revealed Tuesday was the highest in Venezuela’s recent history. It was lower than previous reporting from the opposition-controlled National Assembly, which calculated the figure at almost 1,700,000%.
In contrast to both, the International Monetary Fund estimated that last year, Venezuela’s inflation was 929,797%. In the United States, by comparison, inflation hovered around 2% last year.
The Central Bank of Venezuela data also highlighted a huge drop in oil exports — which has decimated an economy heavily reliant on the sale of oil on the world markets. In 2013, the country exported about $85 billion worth of oil. That number fell to $35 billion in 2015 and $30 billion last year.
Venezuela has more oil reserves than any other nation. But production has collapsed following years of underinvestment and the country’s current crisis. The fall in oil production occurred before the United States announced sanctions against the Venezuelan oil industry earlier this year. Shipments to the United States, long Venezuela’s leading customer, have since vanished.
The reports appeared to confirm earlier research by the IMF and the World Bank that have chronicled the collapse of the Venezuelan economy.
The central bank did not announce the data release in advance, and the government of embattled President Nicols Maduro has not commented on why the figures were released or the data itself.
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The Venezuelan opposition’s envoy to the United States said he met Pentagon and State Department officials in Washington on Monday to discuss “all aspects of the Venezuelan crisis.”
Carlos Vecchio, opposition leader Juan Guaido’s ambassador to Washington, said in a message on Twitter that the talks held at the State Department had been “very positive” but offered no further details. “We continue to advance,” he said.
The talks were arranged at the request of Guaido, leader of the opposition-controlled National Assembly who invoked the constitution to assume an interim presidency in January, arguing that socialist President Nicolas Maduro’s 2018 re-election was illegitimate.
The United States and many European and Latin American countries have recognized Guaido as Venezuela’s rightful leader. But Maduro retains control of state functions and the support of the military’s top brass, as well as allies such as Russia, Cuba and China.
The purpose of Monday’s meeting was to discuss the U.S. Defense Department’s “past and future role related to humanitarian assistance and regional support,” a State Department official said ahead of the talks.
President Donald Trump and senior aides have not ruled out military action in the crisis-stricken South American country, repeatedly saying that “all options are on the table.”
But Washington has made clear it prefers to exert continued economic and diplomatic pressure to push Maduro out, and many experts have said the U.S. use of military force is unlikely.
I know these days we have much news to take of The Brexit, Trump and the wall (again), and always the Kardashians are doing something we want to know better. Also, you’ve heard about Venezuela (again). Venezuela has two presidents; yes, two presidents. It is like Game of Thrones, there is one legitime president, and one sit on the iron throne, the usurper.
It sounds complicated; it is complicated. Then, I only ask you to read and read a lot before you can have an opinion. This crisis has over twenty years. It is not a war between poor and rich people. It is dictatorship, violence, immigration, and thousands of people dying. If you want to understand better the crisis, you can read these articles:
Two keys to understanding the battle of the two presidents
1. It is not a coup d’etat.
I will repeat: it is not a coup d’etat. You can watch the moment Juan Guaidó sworn as Interim President of Venezuela. The place was full of people who sworn with him. Venezuelans are happy because this guy is the new president. There is no military presence in Guaidó’s actions.
The truth is Nicolas Maduro has never won an election even worse, according to the Constitution he should not have run in the first elections because he was the Interim President in 2013 and it was illegal. Nicolas Madura said he won in 2013 and 2018. A lie.
All the democratic powers are in Maduro’s hands: military, electoral and judicial. He only lost the Congress, and as an answer, he tried to eliminate, and later he invented a parallel Assembly.
In January, our legally elect National Assembly chose a new president of this institution. This guy named Juan Gaidó became the president of the Congress; he read our Constitution deeply and determined that according to the article 223 the illegal election of 2018 made Nicolas Maduro’s government illegal. The National Assembly does not recognize Maduro. Then, Guaidó as president of National Assembly assumed the executive power. It is legal. You can research our Constitution.
Also, if you want my opinion, we could have done this action years ago, but only Guaidó has the idea.
2. It is not the US interventionism.
I don’t like Donald Trump nor Marco Rubio nor Republican party as much as you do. But, I have to admit that their help is invaluable. You have an idealized idea about democracy because you have lived and grew up in a place where democracy works, but when the democracy dies, and the power is all in one place, the citizens are prisoners.
It is too easy to say “Why you don’t protest?” We did. We have protested for eighteen years. We have lost hundreds of Venezuelans in these protests; they were murdered because they went to express their dissatisfaction, and thousands have been arrested, and they became political prisoners; they’ve tortured. Only the last week (January 21 and January 26) there are almost 30 murders and 300 political prisoners (one of then a 14-year-girl). Think in all these mothers who lost their kids because they went to protest.
You can ask “Why don’t they vote?” Because it is a farce. We do not trust our electoral institution; any results they gave is a lie.
We need help; we need help from other countries. We need somebody who stands with us and gives us the tools to wake up of this nightmare. Trump administration is helping. Do you know the US is the biggest buyer of Venezuela’s oil? The US government recognize Guaidó as president. Then, they will start paying our money to Guaidó instead of Maduro.
I like this simile: if you see your neighbors hurting their kids, you will call the police; won’t you? Because even though it is not your house, you want to help those kids. Here is the same.
I only ask you don’t judge this situation just because you hate Trump. It is the first time he is helping somebody else. And if you are worried about interventionism, please check to whet Cuba, Russia, and China are doing with Venezuela.
Venezuelan crisis is not over. I don’t know if we can have a change with Juan Guaidó. Maybe, it does not work, but I can say Venezuelans want to live in freedom. We are not going to stop until we get it.
(DN) Caracas, 12 mai 2019 (Lusa) – O general de divisão da Força Aérea Venezuelana, Ramón Rangel, declarou hoje desobediência ao regime do Presidente Nicolás Maduro, e instou os venezuelanos a lutarem contra a “influência castro-comunista” no país.
“Não mais castro-comunismo para a Venezuela, temos que ser livres, soberanos, retomar a nossa soberania. Chegou a hora de nos levantarmos e lutar contra o castro-comunismo”, afirma num vídeo divulgado através do Youtube.
Ramon Rángel foi um dos militares que em 1992 participou na frustrada intentona golpista contra o então presidente Carlos Andrés Pérez (falecido, foi Presidente entre 1989 e 1993 e entre 1974 e 1979) liderado pelo falecido líder socialista Hugo Chávez (foi Presidente entre 1999 e 2013).
“É inconcebível que mais de quatro milhões de venezuelanos peçam esmola fora do país (…). Temos que afastar o medo e sair às ruas para protestar, para buscar a união militar e para mudar este sistema político”, afirma.
No vídeo, o militar diz atuar segundo a constituição venezuelana e apela às Forças Armadas Bolivarianas da Venezuela para que se “apeguem ao artigo 328” da Constituição, que afirma que os cidadãos “não devem ser servis a uma pessoa ou parcialidade política”.
“Não continuemos dizendo leais sempre, traidores nunca, porque estamos sendo traidores à Constituição Nacional”, afirma o militar.
Por outro lado, explica que durante vários anos, a pedido de Hugo Chávez, esteve em Havana como encarregado de negócios e insistiu que “o povo cubano está submetido a uma ditadura” desde há mais de sessenta anos.
“Ao estar em Cuba, eu estava a ser servil, não apenas a uma parcialidade política, mas ao castro-comunismo que nos levou (na Venezuela) ao que hoje em dia temos como resultado da união entre Cuba e Venezuela”, disse.
A presidente da ONG Organização Controlo Cidadão para a Segurança e Defesa das Forças Armadas, Rocío San Miguel, já reagiu à declaração do general Ramón Rangel contra Nicolás Maduro, afirmando que o militar é conhecedor do relacionamento entre Caracas e Havana.
“O significado do pronunciamento do general de divisão Ramón Rangel é muito importante. Ele conhece a trama de negócios Caracas-Havana. Os segredos do tratamento da doença e morte de Chávez em Cuba e do rumo que está a tomar o chavismo militar na sua rotura com (Nicolás) Maduro”, escreveu na sua conta do Twitter.
Desde janeiro último que vários militares se têm manifestado contra o Governo do Presidente Nicolás Maduro e manifestado apoio ao Presidente do parlamento, o opositor Juan Guaidó.
A crise política na Venezuela agravou-se em 23 de janeiro, quando Juan Guaidó, jurou assumir as funções de presidente interino e prometeu formar um Governo de transição e organizar eleições livres.
Guaidó, de 35 anos, contou de imediato com o apoio de mais de 50 países, incluindo os EUA e a maioria dos países da União Europeia, entre os quais Portugal, que o reconheceram como presidente interino encarregado de organizar eleições livres e transparentes.
Na madrugada de 30 de abril, um grupo de militares manifestou apoio a Juan Guaidó, que pediu à população para sair à rua e exigir uma mudança de regime.
Nicolás Maduro, 56 anos, no poder desde 2013, denunciou a iniciativa do presidente do parlamento como uma tentativa de golpe de Estado liderada pelos Estados Unidos.
À crise política na Venezuela soma-se uma grave crise económica e social, que já levou mais de 2,3 milhões de pessoas a fugirem do país desde 2015, de acordo com dados da ONU.
Há cerca de uma semana que o Departamento de Estado dos EUA, a OEA e a oposição exilada estão a preparar uma operação de extração que se pretende ser “limpa e curta, como a de Bin Laden”.Partilhe
Há cerca de uma semana que o Departamento de Estado dos EUA, a Organização do Estados Americanos (OEA) e membros exilados da oposição ao governo venezuelano estão a preparar uma operação de extração de Nicolás Maduro que se pretende ser “limpa e curta, como a de Osama Bin Laden“, noticia este sábado o El Español.
Poucos dias após a libertação do opositor Leopoldo López da prisão domiciliária em que se encontrava, o jornal espanhol teve acesso a um documento secreto que esquematiza o plano em preparação — um processo em que a OEA, liderada pelo uruguaio Luis Almagro, um feroz opositor de Hugo Chávez e Nicolás Maduro, está a ter um papel fundamental. Outra figura-chave é Miguel Angél Martín Tortabú, um dos representantes do Supremo Tribunal venezuelano que estão em exílio. Com a colaboração do Departamento de Estado dos EUA, o plano está a ser preparado, com a consciência de que “a ditadura não sairá voluntariamente”.
“Com a saída de Maduro, ou a sua detenção — isto é, a saída pelo próprio pé ou com algemas — a caminho de um exílio ou uma prisão no estrangeiro, o processo é inexorável e estamos a prepará-lo há cerca de uma semana”, disse uma fonte envolvida no processo ao El Español. “A operação de extração, se for necessária, será como a de Osama Bin Laden, limpa e curta — há apenas três ou quatro pessoas que têm de ser detidas”.
O líder da oposição a Nicolás Maduro na Venezuela deu uma entrevista à RTP na qual fez depender a hipótese de uma ação militar na Venezuela que resolva o impasse no país do apoio de aliados internacionais. Juan Guaidó, que é reconhecido por mais de 50 países (mas não por Nicolás Maduro) como presidente interino da Venezuela, afirmou à estação pública portuguesa que uma intervenção externa no país acontecerá mediante dois pressupostos: “quando os aliados estiverem dispostos a dar esse tipo de ajuda” e sendo “a última opção — ou a única — que reste aos venezuelanos”.
(MoscowTimes) Sergei Lavrov and Mike Pompeo will soon meet in Helsinki to discuss Venezuela’s future.
Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo are heading towards a contentious meeting in Finland (their first since the Helsinki summit last year) with the crisis in Venezuela crowding out almost all other items on the agenda.
Last week, Russia and Cuba may have thwarted a U.S. backed plot to engineer a peaceful transfer of power from Nicolas Maduro to a transitional government led by interim president Juan Guaido and Venezuela’s top officials, including Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino and Supreme Court Chief Justice Maikel Moreno.
Secretary Pompeo accused Moscow of dissuading Maduro from leaving the country (allegedly he was assured of safe passage to Guatemala) when his plane was already on the tarmac. Moscow furiously denied the charges when Pompeo phoned Lavrov on May 1 to protest.
On May 3, U.S. President Donald Trump called Russia’s President Vladimir Putin to flag American concerns over Russia’s “disruptive role” in Venezuela and stress his country’s determination to ensure Venezuela’s return to democratic rule.
But, as common in his personal interactions with Putin, Trump quickly lost the initiative, allowing the discussion on Venezuela to drift towards the softer subject of humanitarian aid.
Putin expressed Russia’s displeasure with U.S interference in Venezuela while convincing Trump that he “was not looking at all to get involved in Venezuela”.
Despite Trump’s going “full Helsinki” on his phone chat with Putin, the U.S.-Russia geopolitical stand-off in Venezuela now threatens to derail the few remaining cooperative lanes in the relationship. White House national security advisor John Bolton made it clear on May 1: “This is our hemisphere — it’s not where the Russians ought to be interfering”.
Three weeks ago, the same point, in even more forceful terms, was privately made by Fiona Hill, NSC Senior Director for Europe, Russia and Eurasia during her visit to Moscow.
The Kremlin was struck by Hill’s prioritization of Venezuela as the most important issue in the relationship due to its direct impact on U.S. politics and the 2020 presidential race in Florida. Moscow concluded then it found an issue it could use to force the U.S. to grant concession elsewhere, most notably in Ukraine.
Russia believes that the risk of a U.S. military intervention in Venezuela is low (despite secret meetings at the Pentagon), since Trump does not want to get stuck in another unpopular war. But politically Trump is so heavily invested in a “win” in Venezuela that he has all but drawn himself an untenable red line with prospects of a major loss of face, while his strategy there is just “winging it”. Moscow may be undervaluing Trump’s ability to turn on a dime, but still thinks it finally has leverage.
Russia’s support for Maduro is driven by financial and energy interests, as well as by the Kremlin’s vision of a multi-polar world order, where Russia should block U.S. attempts at regime change in sovereign states friendly to Moscow. But the Russian leadership practices a transactional approach to international affairs in line with Russia’s hierarchy, where core Russian interests trump goals of less importance.
Bolton’s invocation of the Monroe Doctrine and his “spheres of influence framing” makes Moscow believe that, if done on an equal basis, a similar right should be recognized for Russia in Ukraine and other parts of the “near abroad”.
For Moscow, a deal of equals on Venezuela where Russia helps the U.S. diffuse the crisis by engineering a constitutional transition, should involve an equally significant concession by the U.S. (on a par with JFK-Khrushchev deal to remove nuclear missiles from Cuba and Turkey) to pressure Kiev into fully implementing the Minsk-2 agreements that would truncate Ukraine’s sovereignty and allow Moscow to retain some degree of control over Kiev’s security policies.
Putin specifically mentioned that during his call with Trump. Withdrawing Russian military support for Maduro should also be matched by the withdrawal of U.S. military assistance to Ukraine.
So far Moscow has been frustrated by American refusal to engage in such bargaining of equals through the U.S. initiated bilateral high-level channel of communication on Venezuela (which Moscow assumed it was intended for). The first meeting between Deputy Foreign Minister Ryabkov and U.S. Special Envoy for Venezuela Elliot Abrams in mid-March ended in the U.S. presenting no bargains and simply repeating its demands Russia ends its support for Maduro.
Sending two Russian military planes to Caracas days after the meeting in Rome was Moscow signaling its position if America wasn’t ready to take them seriously going forward.
Trust between Moscow and Washington is currently non-existent. No side could be sure that even if a deal was reached, the other side would implement its end of the bargain. The meeting between Lavrov and Pompeo may prove to be as bitter as the one held by Hill if neither side signals their willingness to negotiate. Or it might be the wrong format altogether, actual deals might require a secret channel or a one-on-one presidential sit-down.
Moscow, however, knows that the events of last week do not augur well for Maduro’s long-term rule. The Venezuelan military is sitting on the fence and its leaders are mulling their options.
The deal offered to them by the opposition (not just amnesty, but a retention of their power in the transitional government) is more serious than anything discussed before. Moscow does not have control over Venezuela’s military the way it had in Syria, where pro-Assad officers knew they and their families would be slaughtered if they lost the war. Nor are there foreign expeditionary forces of non-Russian provenance supplied and funded by an allied power (Iran) to do the heaviest fighting.
Moscow is ready to sell its stake in Maduro, but it is still unclear whether Washington is ready to offer the right price.
(OBS) A Casa Branca acusa Cuba de ter cerca de 25 mil cubanos infiltrados na Venezuela e admite uma abertura económica se a ilha retirar o seu apoio a Maduro, caso contrário reforçará o bloqueio económico.Partilhe
Os EUA endurecerão a sua posição contra a ilha “se não deixarem a Venezuela”
O Presidente dos Estados Unidos, Donald Trump, admitiu na quarta-feira uma abertura económica a Cuba se a ilha retirar o seu apoio ao Presidente venezuelano Nicolás Maduro, caso contrário reforçará o bloqueio económico.
“Com o movimento certo, Cuba poderia sair-se muito bem, poderíamos fazer uma abertura”, disse Trump, em entrevista ao canal de televisão Fox Business, na qual reiterou, uma vez mais, que os EUA endurecerão a sua posição contra a ilha “se não deixarem a Venezuela”.
Na terça-feira, Trump ameaçou, no Twitter, que “se as tropas e milícias cubanas não CESSAREM imediatamente as suas operações militares e de outro tipo, com o objetivo de provocar morte e destruição à Constituição da Venezuela, será imposto à ilha de Cuba um embargo completo, juntamente com sanções do maior nível”.
A Casa Branca acusa Cuba de ter cerca de 25 mil cubanos da sua Defesa infiltrados na Venezuela, algo que a ilha nega, acusando Washington de “mentir descaradamente”.
Na quarta-feira, o secretário de Estado norte-americano, Mike Pompeo, disse que uma “ação militar” é “possível”, se for “necessária” para favorecer a transição política na Venezuela.
The FT’s Gideon Long reports as clashes between government forces and populist protesters continue. President Nicolás Maduro says he has defeated an ‘attempted coup’ by opposition leader Juan Guaidó who had failed to turn armed forces against his regime